Abstract
The purpose of this article is to depict some characteristics of political change in the State of San Luis Potosí in the period 1991-2012. We consider that a substantial part of the process in this change has turned into the fulfillment of the elections that gradually, and with ups and downs, have allowed that, with the exercise of the suffrage, citizens configure a distribution of political power in a growing way of competition. The research includes the analysis of Governor, Legislators (diputados) and Local Governments (Ayuntamientos) in the referred period. The basis of the study resides in the identification of different winners of representation charges through time, and as a result, a diversity of phenomena are identified and discussed throughout this paper. However, the most relevant goal of this article has to do with the increase of electoral competition in the federal entity, which was reflected in a complex and changing distribution of political power. A framework of rules and institutions was built in this state, and it led the different political trends of society into the democratic route. This situation had as a result that party preferences of citizens could be expressed in a more genuine way than they were in prior times, which allowed that the evaluations of electors included a diversity of elements, such as the functioning of their governments and their expectations that in different campaigns candidates projected to future, defining the direction of their votes.References
ALCOCER, J. (1997). “El ciclo de las reformas electorales, 1978-1996”. Diálogo y Debate de Cultura Política, abril-junio: 99-114.
BECERRA, R., Salazar, P. y Woldenberg, J. (2005 [2000]). La mecánica del cambio político en México. Elecciones, partidos y reformas. México: Ediciones Cal y Arena.
CALVILLO, T. (1986). El navismo o los motivos de la dignidad. México: Formas Impresas Kaiser.
COX, G. (2004 [1997]). La coordinación estratégica de los sistemas electorales del mundo. Hacer que los votos cuenten. Barcelona: Gedisa.
DIAMOND, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy. Nueva York: Times Books.
DIAMOND, L. y Morlino, L. (eds.) (2005). Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
MEYENBERG, Y. (2003). “Reformas electorales, definiciones institucionales y comportamientos políticos. El caso de México”. En: Y. Meyenberg Leycegui y J. M. Herrera Ramos (coords). Las reglas y los comportamientos: 25 años de reformas institucionales en México. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
MEYER, L. (2005). “La visión general”. En: Una historia contemporánea de México. Actores. México: Océano.
O’DONNELL, G., Vargas, J, y Iazzeta, O. M. (2004): The quality of democracy. Theory and applications, Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press. Pasquino, G. (2011 [1997]). Nuevo curso de ciencia política. México: FCE.
PNUD (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo), Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos (2010). Nuestra democracia. México: PNUD, OEA, FCE.
RUBIO, P. y Avilés, H. (2011). “La alternancia breve: El regreso del PRI al Gobierno del Estado. Reflexiones sobre el proceso electoral en San Luis Potosí”. En: M. Larrosa Haro y J. Santiago Castillo (coords.). Elecciones y partidos políticos en México. México: UA M-Iztapalapa. 495-521.
LOML. Ley Orgánica del Municipio Libre del Estado de San Luis Potosí.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2014 Revista de El Colegio de San Luis
