The ethnography in environmental conflicts and the borders of anthropology
PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

ethnography
frontiers of anthropology
ethics
environmental conflicts
hydraulic management

How to Cite

The ethnography in environmental conflicts and the borders of anthropology. (2020). Revista De El Colegio De San Luis, 10(21), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.21696/rcsl102120201183

Abstract

Our goal is to discuss the epistemological boundaries of Anthropology in the ethical context of ethnographers studying an environmental conflict. We review the positions in an ethno-graphy of Temacapulín, Jalisco (Mexico) community in resistance by the construction of the El Zapotillo dam, through a longitudinal ethnographic work (follow-up from 2005 to 2018) that discovers details of a “big dam” culminated in neoliberalism, a tip to state’s hydraulic policy and a support for a management model that transfers public investment for private utilitarianism. A community in environmental conflict is the setting for different types of ethnography depending on the academic, institutional, personal implications, because it raises critical positions to the economic direction of public policy. Given the characteristics of environmental conflicts, this reflection discusses the boundaries of Anthropology according to the ethical position of ethnographers who study resistance to hydraulic projects that some denounce, others interrogate, but also a few argue legally.

PDF (Spanish)
XML (Spanish)

The authors, by accepting the publishing of their text, automatically assign to El Colegio de San Luis, A. C., the rights of the first edition, and authorize it for its printed and electronic dissemination in the Revista de El Colegio de San Luis. They also give their permission for their text to be included in the national and institutional repository.

Any form of subsequent publication shall make reference to the first edition in the Revista de El Colegio de San Luis.