Palabras clave
public institutions
corporate culture
public management
administrative management.
Cómo citar
Resumen
This paper aims to critically analyze the structure and the new culture of public administration paradigm named as the new administration or public management of public organizations. The main challenge is to try to explain why the dysfunctional management practices in the structure and the new culture of public organizations that are copied from focusing on administrative processes management practices of private organizations model. In doing so, it has been reviewed the literature in general from the perspective of neo-institutionalism on this subject and by using the method of critical analysis of organizations. More than dysfunctions, in this work the main challenges and worries to the implementation of the paradigm of management or governance are identified. Despite the theoretical -methodological nuances of the new institutional economy and its implications for economic theory, it is inadequate to describe only subtly strategies of the private management. This paper presents an original approach to the critical analysis of new public management. The revision of the paradigm of new public management is carried out essentially in the methodological steps needed to question and identify the action of the state in the administration of organizations and public agencies, by applying the specific management practices, based on the theoretical and methodological framework of the new institutionalism critical criteria.
Citas
ARELLANO, D.; Gil, J.; Ramírez, J., and Rojano, A. (2000). Nueva gerencia pública en acción: Procesos de modernización presupuestal. Un análisis inicial en términos organizativos (Nueva Zelanda, Reino Unido, Australia y México). Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 17. Retrieved from http://old.clad.org/portal/publicaciones-del-clad/revista-clad-reforma-democracia/articulos/017-junio-2000/nueva-gerencia-publica-en-accion-procesos-de-modernizacion-presupuestal.-un-analisis-inicial-en-terminos-organizativos-nueva-zelanda-reino-unido-australia-y-mexico-1
BILLIS, D. y Glennerster, H. (1998). Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage. Journal of Social Policy, 27(1): 79-98. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279497005175.
BURREL, G., and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States: Heinemann Educational Books.
CAIDEN, G. E. (1989). The problem of ensuring the public accountability of public officials. In J. G. Jabbra, O. P. Dwivedi (eds.). Public Service Accountability: A Comparative Perspective (pp. 17-38). West Hartford, Connecticut, United States: Kumarian.
CERNY, P.G. (1990). The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency, and the Future of the State. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
DIMAGGIO, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. Powell and Paul J. Dimmaggio (eds.). The new institutionalismin organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago, United, States: University of Chicago.
FESLER, J. W., and Kettl, D. F. (1991). The politics of the administrative process. 2nd ed. Chatham, New Jersey, United States: Chatham House.
GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, I. M. (2007). La nueva gestión pública: Evolución y tendencias. Presupuesto y Gasto Público (47): 37-64. Retrieved from http://www.ief.es/documentos/recursos/publicaciones/revistas/presu_gasto_publico/47_GarciaSanchez.pdf.
GUERRERO OROZCO, O. (2003). Nueva gerencia pública: ¿Gobierno sin política? Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 8(23): 379-395. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29002302.
HAGE, J., and Finsterbusch, K. (1987). Organizational change as a development strategy. Models and tactics for improving third world orgabizations. Boulder, Colorado, United States: Lynne Rienner.
HEYMANN, P. B. (1987). The politics of public management. New Haven, Connecticut, United States: Yale University Press.
HOGWOOD, B. W. (1999). Autonomía burocrática y responsabilidad. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 15:19-37.
JOHNSON, N. (1997). Book review. Journal of Social Policy, 26 (4): 559.
KELMAN, S. (1990). Procurement and public management the fear of discretion and the quality of government performance. Washignton, D. C.: United States: AEI Press.
KEMP, P. (1993). Beyond nexts steps: A civil service for the 21st Century. London, United Kingdom: Social Market Foundation.
KETTL, D. F. (1993). Public administration: The state of the field. In Ada W. Finifter. Political Science. The state of the discipline (pp. 409-428). Washignton, D. C., United States: American Political Science Association.
KLAGES, H., and Hippler, G. (1991). Mitarbeitermotivation als Modernisierungsperspektive. Gütersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
KOOIMAN, J. (1993). Societal-Political Governance: Introduction. In J. Kooiman (ed.). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
KUHN, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, Illinois, United States: The University of Chicago.
LACHMAN, R.; Nedd, A., and Hinings, B. (1994). Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework. Management Science, 40(1): 40-55.
LINDBERG, S. I. (2009). Accountability: The ore concept and its subtypes. Working paper No. 1. Africa Power and Politics Programme (APPP) by the Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/appp/appp-wp1.pdf.
LYNN, L. E. (1996a). The new public management as an international phenomenon: A skeptical view. International Public Management Journal 1(1). In international Public Management Network.
LYNN, L. E. (1996b). Public management as art, science and profession. Chatham, N. J., United States: Chatham House.
LYNN, L. E. (1997). Public management and government performance: A consideration of theory and evidence. Working Paper 9704. The Irving B. Harris Graduate School and Public Policy Studies, The University of Chicago.
MASTERMAN, M. (1970). The nature of paradigm. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of knowledge (pp. 59-89). London, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
MOE, R. C. (1993). Let’s rediscover government, not reinvent it. Government Executive, 26(6): 46-60.
MOE, R. C., and Gilmour, R. S. (1995). Rediscovering principles of public administration: The neglected principles of public law. Public Administration Review, 55(2): 135-146.
OSBORNE, D., and Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to state house. Reading, Massachusetts, United States: City Hall to Pentagon, Addison-Wesley.
OSBORNE, D., and Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to state house. New York, United States: City Hall to Pentagon, Plume.
O’TOOLE, L. J., and Meier, K. J. (2009). The Human Side of Public Organizations Contributions to Organizational Performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(5): 499-518.
POWELL, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/~woodyp/papers/powell_neither.pdf.
ROSENTHAL, S. R. (1982). Managing government operations. Glenview, Illinois, United States: Scoot Foresman.
SALAMON, L. M., and Anheir, H. K. (eds.) (1997). Defining the non-profit sector. A cross-national analysis. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
SÉGUIN BERNARD, F., and Chanlat, F. J. (1983). Introduuction. In L’analyze des organisations. Une anthologie sociologique. Tome 1: Les theories de l’organisation. Quebec, Canada: Ëditions Préfontaine.
STIRTON, L., and Martin, L. (2001). Transparency Mechanisms: Building Publicness into Public Services. Journal of Law and Society 28(4): 471-489.
WALDO, D. (1965). Public administration and culture. In M. Roscoe (comp.). Public administration and democracy (pp. 39-61). Syracuse, New York, United States: Syracuse University Press.
WEBER, M. (1982). La política como vocación. In Escritos políticos, vol. II (pp. 308-360). Distrito Federal, México: Folios Ediciones.
WEBER, M. (1996). Bureaucracy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Los autores, al aceptar la publicación de su texto, conservan los derechos morales, mientras que El Colegio de San Luis, A. C obtiene los derechos patrimoniales de la primera edición, que lo autorizan a su difusión electrónica en la Revista de El Colegio de San Luis. De igual manera, otorgan su permiso para que su texto sea incluido en el repositorio institucional y nacional.
Cualquier forma de publicación posterior deberá referir la primera edición en la Revista de El Colegio de San Luis.